Published 20 Mar 2026

Insurance Automation Software: 10 Options and Which One to Choose

This article examines some of the leading insurance automation platforms, looks at feedback from their customers via G2 and describes their pros and cons.

Gerard Newman, Chief Technology Officer
By Gerard Newman, Chief Technology Officer
Updated 20 Mar 2026 | 13 min read

Table Of Contents

Try FlowForma

Automate 10x faster

Native to MS 365

Steamline insurance

Key Takeaways

 
  • Insurance automation uses technology to handle repetitive operational tasks like policy processing, claims routing, and compliance tracking without manual intervention.
  • No single platform fits every insurance use case. The right tool depends on your line of business, team size, and the process you're trying to fix.
  • Core platforms suit enterprise carriers with complex operations, while lightweight no-code tools work better for ops teams that need fast deployment without IT dependency.
  • Before choosing a tool, evaluate how well it integrates with your existing systems, how much configuration it needs, and whether your team can maintain it independently.

 

The biggest mistake insurance teams make when evaluating automation tools is treating them as interchangeable. A platform built for enterprise P&C carriers will overwhelm a growing MGA.

 

A no-code workflow tool will fall short the moment your process hits a complex exception. Picking the wrong one doesn't just waste budget; it sets your automation programme back by months.

 

To avoid this clutter, we’ve curated a list of the 10 insurance automation software platforms (including FlowForma) available today, breaking down what each one is genuinely built for, and where it starts to show its limits.

 

 

10 Insurance Automation Software Tools (& How We Picked Them)

To curate this list, we evaluated how widely recommended insurance automation platforms perform by comparing their capabilities with real user feedback.

We then looked beyond feature lists and assessed what matters in real insurance operations:

 

  • How well each platform automates policy, claims, or underwriting workflows
  • Can it route tasks, approvals, and exceptions without manual intervention?
  • Does it support the documentation, audit trails, and compliance visibility insurers require?
  • How easily does it integrate with policy administration systems, claims platforms, and external data providers?
  • Can it scale across different lines of business without extensive reconfiguration?

 

The tools below include both insurance-specific platforms and broader automation solutions that insurers adapt to operational workflows. We’ve also noted the best use case fit for each platform to help you evaluate them more easily.

 

 

Here is the full breakdown:

 

Tool

Insurance Automation Strength

G2 Rating (out of 5)

Best For

Creatio

CRM + workflow automation across the policy lifecycle

4.7

Insurers unifying CRM and operations

FlowForma

No-code workflows for claims, policy, and compliance processes

4.5

Ops teams automating workflows without IT

MuleSoft

API-led integration across policy, claims, and data systems

4.5

Insurers with complex system landscapes

Insly

Policy administration and bordereaux automation

4.5

Brokers and MGAs managing policy operations

Sapiens

Line-of-business insurance platforms (life, P&C, reinsurance)

4.4

Insurers needing specialised LOB systems

Nintex

Automated policy and compliance document generation

4.3

Enterprises with document-heavy processes

Kissflow

Multi-step approval and internal workflow automation

4.3

Mid-market teams handling approvals

BriteCore

Unified policy, claims, and billing automation

4.3

P&C carriers modernising core systems

Guidewire Software – InsuranceSuite

End-to-end core insurance automation suite

4.1

Enterprise P&C carriers

Verisk

ISO underwriting data and analytics

4.1

Insurers strengthening pricing and risk analysis

Overview of 10 leading insurance automation tools

The Top 10 Insurance Automation Tools (In No Particular Order of Ranking)

Let’s explore each platform in detail—starting with FlowForma.

1. FlowForma

Screenshot of FlowForma insurance page

FlowForma insurance homepage

 

Built for teams that need to move fast without leaning on IT, FlowForma is a no-code process automation tool that fits naturally into insurance operations. You can use it to digitize and automate paper-heavy processes such as policy renewals, claims intake, and compliance checklists, while ops teams stay in control of their own workflows throughout.

Key features of FlowForma

Dynamic intake forms with conditional logic

FlowForma lets you build smart digital forms that adapt based on what a claimant, broker, or agent inputs.

Screenshot of FlowForma’s AI-powered forms

 FlowForma’s AI-powered forms

 

Only relevant fields appear at each stage, and built-in validations prevent incomplete submissions from moving forward, so the data your underwriters and claims handlers receive is accurate from the first touchpoint.

AI-powered workflow builder (Copilot)

Describe your insurance process in plain language, upload an existing form, or use voice input, and Copilot automatically structures the steps, fields, and conditional logic for you.

 

Screenshot of the FlowForma insurance copilot page

FlowForma playground for insurance

 

Whether you're digitizing a manual claims intake process or setting up a new line of business workflow, you can go from concept to a deployable automation in minutes.

Microsoft 365 integration

Screenshot highlighting FlowForma’s integration capabilities

 A look at how FlowForma integrates with other platforms

FlowForma works natively with SharePoint, Teams, and Outlook, so workflow data flows directly into the tools your underwriters, claims handlers, and ops teams are already working in every day.

Automated routing, approvals, and escalations

You can define rules that automatically route submissions based on risk complexity, coverage type, or line of business. High-value or non-standard risks go straight to senior underwriters, while straightforward cases move through the approval chain faster with minimal manual intervention.

One-click document generation

Once a decision is made, FlowForma generates the relevant documents directly from the captured data.

Screenshot of FlowForma’s document generation feature

Generate documents automatically with FlowForma’s document generation feature
Screenshot of FlowForma’s document generation feature

Policy schedules, endorsement letters, renewal notices, or compliance confirmations are produced automatically, without anyone having to manually populate a template.

FlowForma’s User Ratings on G2

Category

FlowForma Rating

Overall

4.5/5 (G2)

Ease of Use

8.7/10

Ease of Setup

8.3/10

Quality of Support

9.2/10

FlowForma’s user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of FlowForma

Pros
  • Quick to deploy without technical resources

Image 6 from the document

Source

  • Fast deployment and approval automation compared to more complex enterprise platforms

 

Image 7 from the document

Source

  • Intuitive for non-technical operations staff

 

Image 8 from the document

Source

Cons
  • Learning curve is steep without structured onboarding

 

Image 9 from the document

Source

  • Reporting features can feel basic for enterprise-scale needs

 

Image 10 from the document

Source

  • Fewer native integrations outside the Microsoft ecosystem

2. Nintex

 Screenshot of Nintex's Homepage

Nintex's Homepage

 

From policy approvals and broker onboarding to audit trails and regulatory submissions, Nintex helps insurance organisations automate the workflows that sit at the heart of their operations. It offers both process mapping and automation in one platform, making it easier to connect how a process is designed to how it actually runs.

Key features of Nintex

Visual workflow designer

You can map out end-to-end insurance processes using a drag-and-drop interface. This makes it easier for both operations and IT teams to collaborate on automation design without misalignment.

Document generation

Nintex can auto-generate policy documents, renewal notices, or compliance reports by pulling data from connected systems. This reduces manual document handling across the policy lifecycle.

RPA integration

For legacy insurance systems that don't have APIs, Nintex's robotic process automation capabilities let you automate repetitive desktop tasks like data entry or screen scraping without replacing existing infrastructure.

Process intelligence

Built-in analytics let you track process performance over time. You can identify which workflows are underperforming and use that data to prioritise automation improvements.

Nintex User Ratings on G2

Category

Nintex Rating

Overall

4.3/5 on G2

Ease of Use

8.4/10

Ease of Setup

8/10

Quality of Support

8.1/10

Nintex user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of Nintex

Pros
  • Covers both process mapping and automation in one tool
  • Strong document generation capabilities relevant to insurance

Image 12 from the document

Source

  • Good fit for enterprises with a mix of modern and legacy systems
Cons
  • Pricing can be high for smaller insurance carriers or MGAs

Image 13 from the document

Source

  • Some advanced features require significant configuration time

 

Image 14 from the document

Source

  • The learning curve steepens with more complex process requirements, since the platform is not insurance-specific

 

Image 15 from the document

Source

3. MuleSoft (from Salesforce)

 Screenshot of MuleSoft’s homepage

 MuleSoft’s homepage

 

If your policy admin, claims platform, CRM, and external data providers all live in separate systems, MuleSoft is what brings them together. It's a Salesforce product, so it carries the reliability and enterprise credibility you'd expect from that ecosystem. At its core, it's an integration and API platform that keeps data moving across your tech stack so your teams aren't working in silos.

Key features of MuleSoft

API-led connectivity

MuleSoft structures integrations in layers, making it easier to connect core insurance systems like Guidewire or Majesco with external partners, portals, or data enrichment services without building point-to-point connections that become hard to maintain.

Pre-built insurance connectors

MuleSoft's Anypoint Exchange includes pre-built connectors for common insurance platforms and data standards. This reduces the time it takes to set up integrations between your existing tools.

Real-time data integration

You can enable real-time data sharing between systems — for example, triggering a claims workflow the moment a loss notice is received from a third-party system or partner portal.

Centralised integration management

All your API connections are managed from one place. This gives your IT team visibility and control over how data moves across the organisation, which matters for compliance and audit readiness.

MuleSoft User Ratings on G2

Category

MuleSoft Rating

Overall

4.5/5 on G2

Ease of Use

8.3/10

Ease of Setup

8.3/10

Quality of Support

8.5/10

MuleSoft’s user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of MuleSoft

Pros
  • Excellent for complex, multi-system insurance environments

 

Image 17 from the document

Source

  • Reduces technical debt from point-to-point integrations

 

Image 18 from the document

Source

  • Strong governance and monitoring capabilities
Cons
  • High implementation cost and complexity

Image 19 from the document

Source

  • Steep learning curve, complex setup, and custom legacy integrations.

 

Image 20 from the document

Source

  • Not designed for business users to operate independently

4. Creatio

Screenshot of Creatio’s homepage

 Creatio’s homepage

 

Managing customer relationships and operational workflows across two separate platforms adds unnecessary friction for your team. Creatio brings both together, combining CRM and process automation in one place so you can automate across the full policy lifecycle while keeping your customer data connected throughout.

Key features of Creatio

1. No-code workflow studio

Creatio's Studio lets you design and launch automated workflows through a visual interface. You can configure processes for new business quoting, mid-term adjustments, or renewal campaigns without needing development support.

2. CRM with insurance-relevant data model

The built-in CRM is designed to be customised around your business. You can structure it to reflect policyholder relationships, agent hierarchies, or broker channels relevant to your distribution model.

3. AI-powered recommendations

Creatio uses AI to surface next-best-action recommendations within workflows. In an insurance context, this can help underwriters prioritise submissions or prompt agents to take follow-up actions at the right time.

4. Omnichannel communication tools

You can manage customer communications across email, SMS, and web portals from within the platform. This is useful for automating outbound touchpoints like renewal reminders or claims status updates.

Creatio’s User Ratings on G2

Category

Creatio Rating

Overall rating

4.7/5 on G2

Ease of Setup

8.4/10

Ease of Use

9.0/10

Quality of Support

9.1/10

Creatio’s user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of Creatio

Pros
  • Combines CRM and process automation without needing two tools

Image 22 from the document

Source

  • Flexible data model that can be shaped to insurance use cases
  • Strong no-code capabilities for business-led automation

 

Image 23 from the document

Source

Cons
  • Configuring both CRM and automation layers increases setup complexity

 

Image 24 from the document

Source

  • Advanced insurance automation logic requires significant customization and higher-tier licensing

Image 25 from the document

Source

  • Back-office focused teams may find the CRM adds unnecessary overhead

5. Insly

 Screenshot of Insly’s homepage

 Insly’s homepage

 

Built specifically for brokers, MGAs, and insurers, Insly handles the operational side of running an insurance business without requiring months of configuration. You can start small and scale as your business grows, and because it's modular and built on open APIs, it fits into your existing setup without a costly overhaul.

Key features of Insly

Policy administration and management

Insly handles the full policy lifecycle, from quote and bind through to renewal and cancellation. You can automate the steps between these stages so your team spends less time on manual handoffs.

Bordereaux and reporting automation

Generating bordereaux for capacity providers is a notoriously manual process. Insly automates the extraction and formatting of this data, reducing errors and the time your team spends on period-end reporting.

Document management

Policy documents, endorsements, and certificates can be generated and distributed automatically based on workflow triggers. This keeps documentation consistent and reduces turnaround time for customers and brokers.

Commission and accounting management

Insly includes tools to manage broker commissions, premium accounting, and payment reconciliation. These features connect to the operational workflows so financial data stays accurate without separate manual tracking.

Insly’s User Ratings on G2

Category

Insly Rating

Overall

4.5 on G2

Ease of Use

Not enough data available

Ease of Setup

Not enough data available

Quality of Support

Not enough data available

Caption: Insly’s G2 user ratings

Pros and cons of Insly

P.S. Insly boasts a 4.5 rating with just one review.

Image 27 from the document

Based on this review and our evaluation criteria, we’ve collated the following pros and cons:

Pros
  • Built for insurance operations—minimal configuration to get started
  • Strong policy admin and bordereaux capabilities
  • Well-suited for brokers and MGAs specifically
Cons
  • Less flexible for organisations with highly customised workflow needs
  • Integration options outside core insurance systems can be limited
  • May lack depth for very large, complex carrier environments

6. Kissflow

Screenshot of Kissflow’s homepage

Kissflow homepage

 

For insurance ops teams managing a steady volume of internal approvals, task routing, and exception handling, Kissflow offers a clean and accessible way to automate those processes without relying on IT. It's a cloud-based workflow platform built for business users who want to move quickly and stay in control.

Key features of Kissflow

App-based workflow builder

Each workflow in Kissflow is packaged as a lightweight app that your team can access and use independently. You can create separate apps for processes such as new-agent onboarding, complaint management, or internal audit requests.

Approval workflow automation

Kissflow is well-suited for multi-level approval flows. You can configure routing rules so that, for example, large claims or high-risk policy changes are automatically escalated to the right approver based on predefined thresholds.

Work item tracking

Every task or request moving through a workflow is trackable. Your team can see the status of any item in real time, which helps reduce the back-and-forth that comes with manual follow-ups.

Integration with third-party tools

Kissflow connects with tools like Salesforce, Google Workspace, and Slack. This means you can incorporate it into your existing insurance ops stack without replacing what's already working.

Kissflow User Ratings on G2

Category

Kissflow Rating

Overall

4.3/5 on G2

Ease of Use

8.8/10

Ease of Setup

8.3/10

Quality of Support

8.7/10

Kissflow’s user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of Kissflow

Pros
  • Easy for non-technical teams to build and maintain workflows

Image 29 from the document

Source

  • Clean interface with minimal setup required

 

Image 30 from the document

Source

  • Good for mid-market insurance teams managing internal approvals
Cons
  • Limited suitability for complex, data-intensive insurance processes

 

Image 31 from the document

Source

  • Custom reporting and integrations required for reviewing and editing legal documents

Image 32 from the document Source

  • Less capable than enterprise platforms for large-scale automation needs

7. BriteCore

Screenshot of BriteCore’s homepage

 BriteCore homepage

 

BriteCore is a cloud-native platform built specifically for P&C carriers who are ready to move away from that and run policy, claims, and billing on modern infrastructure designed for how insurance actually works today.

Key features of BriteCore

Policy lifecycle management

BriteCore covers quoting, binding, endorsements, renewals, and cancellations within a single platform. The automation built into each stage reduces the manual effort your team puts into routine policy transactions.

Claims management

The claims module supports first notice of loss through to settlement, with workflow automation at each stage. You can configure rules to route claims by type, value, or complexity so your adjusters focus where they're needed most.

Billing and payment processing

BriteCore handles premium billing, payment plans, and reconciliation automatically. This reduces the administrative burden on your finance and ops teams while keeping policyholder billing accurate.

Open API architecture

BriteCore is built with an open API, making it relatively straightforward to connect with rating engines, third-party data providers, or distribution portals you may already be using.

BriteCore’s User Ratings on G2

Category

BriteCore Rating

Overall

4.3/5 on G2

Ease of Use

9.2/10

Ease of Setup

8.2/10

Quality of Support

8.6/10

BriteCore’s user ratings on G2

Pros and Cons of BriteCore

Pros
  • Designed specifically for P&C carriers with quick deployment

Image 34 from the document

Source

  • Cloud-native with modern architecture that reduces maintenance overhead
  • Covers policy, claims, and billing in one integrated system

 

Image 35 from the document

Source

Cons
  • Needs improvement in reporting functionalities

Image 36 from the document

Source

  • Implementation timelines can be lengthy for carriers migrating from legacy systems
  • Smaller ecosystem compared to larger enterprise platforms

 

Image 37 from the document

Source

8. Guidewire InsuranceSuite

Screenshot of BriteCore’s homepage

Guidewire’s homepage

 

When P&C carriers evaluate core system modernisation, Guidewire is almost always part of that conversation. It's one of the most widely adopted platforms in the industry, built to run policy administration, claims, and billing operations at scale on a single connected system.

Key features of Guidewire

nsuranceSuite integrated core operations

Guidewire's PolicyCenter, ClaimCenter, and BillingCenter work as a connected suite. Automating across all three means your data stays consistent and your teams aren't working from siloed systems.

Guidewire Cloud

The platform is available as a managed cloud offering, reducing your infrastructure management burden and giving you access to regular product updates without disruptive upgrade cycles.

Digital portals for agents and policyholders

Guidewire includes tools to build self-service portals for agents and customers. You can automate routine interactions such as policy queries, endorsement requests, or claims status updates, so your team doesn't have to handle each one manually.

Marketplace ecosystem

Guidewire's Marketplace offers pre-built integrations with a wide range of third-party vendors—from data enrichment providers to analytics tools—making it easier to extend your automation capabilities without custom development.

Guidewire User Ratings on G2

Category

Guidewire InsuranceSuite (out of 10)

Overall

4.1/5 on G2

Ease of Use

8.6/10

Ease of Setup

7.4/10

Quality of Support

8.8/10

Guidewire’s user ratings on G2

Pros and cons of Guidewire

Pros
  • Purpose-built for P&C insurance at enterprise scale

 

Image 39 from the document

Source

  • Strong ecosystem of implementation partners and pre-built integrations

 

Image 40 from the document

Source

  • Regularly updated with features relevant to the insurance industry
Cons
  • High total cost of ownership, including licensing and implementation

 

Image 41 from the document

Source

  • Significant implementation and configuration effort, especially for migrations

Image 42 from the document

Source

  • Can be heavyweight for smaller carriers or specialist MGAs

9. Sapiens

Image 43 from the document

 Sapiens’s homepage

 

Not every insurer fits the mould that most generalist platforms are built around. Sapiens offers a suite of core platforms covering life, P&C, workers' compensation, and reinsurance, each designed around the specific requirements of that line so you're not spending time bending a generic system to fit your business.

Key features of Sapiens

1. Line-of-business-specific platforms

Sapiens has distinct platforms for different insurance lines rather than a one-size-fits-all system. This means the automation and data models are designed around how each line actually works, reducing the customisation burden on your team.

2. Policy and claims automation

Across its platforms, Sapiens automates core policy transactions and claims handling workflows. You can configure business rules to drive routing, approvals, and exception handling without extensive custom development.

3. Digital and self-service capabilities

Sapiens includes tools for building customer and agent-facing digital experiences. These can be used to automate inbound service requests, quote generation, or claims notifications through web and mobile channels.

4. Reinsurance management

Sapiens has a dedicated reinsurance module that automates treaty and facultative administration, bordereau generation, and settlement calculations — an area where many general platforms fall short.

Sapiens’s User Ratings on G2

Category

Sapiens Rating

Overall

4.4/5 on G2

Ease of Use

Not enough data available

Ease of Setup

Not enough data available

Quality of Support

Not enough data available

 Sapiens’s G2 user ratings

Pros and cons of Sapiens

P.S. Sapiens boasts a 4.4 rating with just four reviews. Based on these reviews and our evaluation criteria, we’ve collated the following pros and cons:

Pros
  • Strong coverage across multiple insurance lines, including specialty areas

 

Image 44 from the document

Source

  • Reinsurance capabilities are more developed than most competitors
  • Designed for insurers rather than adapted from general enterprise software

 

Image 45 from the document

Source

Cons
  • Multiple platforms can make integration across lines of business complex
  • Lacks centralized customization features

 

Image 46 from the document

Source

  • Less well-known outside core insurance markets, with a smaller partner ecosystem

10. Verisk

Screenshot of Verisk’s insurance homepage

Verisk’s insurance homepage

 

Good insurance decisions depend on good data, and that's exactly what Verisk is built to provide. It connects the global insurance industry through proprietary data, analytics, and technology, working as an intelligence layer across the full value chain, from pricing and risk selection to catastrophe modelling and claims handling.

Key features of Verisk

Underwriting and rating

Verisk gives underwriting teams access to ISO rating rules, loss costs, and coverage forms that support accurate, compliant policy pricing across personal and commercial lines.

Claims workflow and analytics

Verisk's claims solutions help streamline workflows and improve customer experience by surfacing the right data at the right stage of the claims process.

Catastrophe and risk modelling

Verisk's catastrophe models help carriers quantify exposure to natural disasters and extreme weather events. This supports more informed reinsurance purchasing, portfolio management, and regulatory reporting.

Life and annuities solutions

For life insurers, Verisk offers tools to drive automation across the policy lifecycle and refine risk selection at both the individual and portfolio levels, reducing the manual effort involved in underwriting and servicing life business.

Verisk’s User Ratings on G2

Category

Verisk Rating

Overall

4.1/5 on G2

Ease of Use

9/10

Ease of Setup

Not enough data available

Quality of Support

Not enough data available

Verisk’s G2 user ratings

Pros and cons of Verisk

Pros
  • Supports P&C, life, reinsurance, and specialty lines
  • ISO data and rating tools strengthen pricing decisions
  • AI-driven claims analytics with real-time document submissions

Image 48 from the document

Source

Cons
  • Data and analytics provider, not a workflow platform
  • Data products can be costly for smaller insurers
  • Requires technical setup to integrate with workflows

Which Insurance Automation Software Is Right for You?

Every platform on this list solves a different automation challenge. Here's a quick guide to help you find the right fit.

 

  • FlowForma: Works great if you're on Microsoft 365 and want to automate insurance workflows without touching code.
  • Nintex: A solid pick if your processes span multiple departments and need structured approvals and document generation.
  • MuleSoft: The right choice if you're running disconnected insurance systems that need to share data reliably across your tech stack.
  • Creatio: A strong fit if you want CRM and process automation in one place, without managing two separate platforms.
  • Insly: Built for brokers and MGAs who need insurance-specific operations like policy admin and bordereaux automation ready to go from day one.
  • Kissflow: A good option if your team manages high volumes of internal approvals and needs a simple, no-code way to keep things moving.
  • BriteCore: Ideal if you're a P&C carrier looking to replace a legacy core system with modern, cloud-native infrastructure.
  • Guidewire: The natural choice for mid-to-large P&C carriers that need enterprise-scale policy, claims, and billing operations on one platform.
  • Sapiens: Best suited for insurers running specialised lines like life, workers' compensation, or reinsurance that generalist platforms don't serve well.
  • Verisk: Essential if your underwriting, claims, or risk decisions depend on accurate, up-to-date data and analytics rather than manual research.

Less Manual Work, Faster Decisions, and Happier Teams—All With FlowForma

Of all the tools on this list, FlowForma is the fastest way for insurance ops teams to move from manual processes to running automation. Describe your claims intake or renewal workflow to Copilot, and it builds the steps, logic, and routing rules for you.

Your team deploys it inside Microsoft 365, where they already work, and every action is logged and auditable from day one.

 

If you're ready to spend less time on admin and more time on work that actually moves the needle, book a demo or start a 7-day free trial today.

 

 

FAQs

  • Some can, particularly platforms with RPA capabilities like Nintex or API-led integration like MuleSoft. However, the depth of that compatibility varies significantly, so integration requirements should be assessed before committing to a platform.

  • It depends on the tool and process complexity. No-code platforms like FlowForma can get a workflow running in days, while core system implementations like Guidewire or Sapiens typically take months of configuration and testing.

  • Generally, yes. Brokers and MGAs benefit most from lightweight, insurance-specific tools like Insly that handle policy admin and bordereaux without enterprise-scale complexity or cost.

  • Workflow automation handles the movement of tasks, approvals, and documents across teams. Core system automation manages the underlying policy, claims, and billing transactions. Most insurers need both, but they don't always need them from the same platform.

  • Look at whether it can handle volume increases, support multiple lines of business, and integrate with additional systems without requiring significant reconfiguration each time your needs change.

Gerard Newman, Chief Technology Officer

Gerard has over 20 years of experience designing and delivering process automation solutions that have allowed businesses to integrate and automate their operations to deliver better customer experiences and improve efficiency. Gerard is focused on ideating new concepts for our product’s roadmap, helping businesses to make the complex simple.

Gerard Newman, Chief Technology Officer